U.S. DOT FY 2024.2 Phase I Pre-Solicitation Q&A
- To create a new account or to sign in with an existing account please click on “sign in” located at the top right of the page.
- A new pop-up window will open to make a selection, you can use an existing Google or Facebook account to access the site, or you might select to create a new account.
- If you choose to access UserVoice with an existing Google or Facebook account, you will be required to enter your login credentials for Google or Facebook and agree to terms of service.
- If you need to create a new account, click "Create an Account" underneath the password box.
- In the next screen, type in the e-mail and click "Verify E-mail".
- Navigate to your inbox and click the link within the e-mail to verify. The link will be generated by noreply@trymagic.com
- That link will be live for 20 minutes. Once that time elapses, you will have to request another one.
- Navigate back to UserVoice, and you will need to provide your name, a password, and agree to terms of service and storage permissions. Click "Create Account".
- Use the “Enter your idea” box located at the middle of the page to enter your questions.
- You may add more detail in the Description box(optional). Do NOT attach any files. The U.S. DOT shall not consider any submitted materials other than questions.
- Enter your e-mail address and password.
- When finished, select “Post idea.” If you registered, you will be able to track responses to your post. Please include only one question or comment per post to help us keep the forum organized.
55 results found
-
Minimum/ideal number of data elements to include in solution?
Is there a minimum number of data elements to be included to be considered for this opportunity? Is one proposal that looks to generate or enhance 5 elements to solve a particular problem less valuable to U.S. DOT than another that looks to enhance or generate 10 elements? Or is the use case of the data the main factor for evaluating?
2 votes -
Preferred standard for data to fill in
Will the DOT be supplying a preferred standard for each of the unavailable or incomplete data attributes?
For example, for a dataset that collects sidewalk surface conditions, a standard may include categories and values to choose from, such as:
- Surface issue: roughness, cracking, heaving
- Severity: mild, moderate, high
- Etc.
This way, there is a national standard for each of the incomplete data attributes that need to be filled out. Perhaps this can only be created after the development of each dataset.
2 votes -
Incomplete Datasets - Introductions from the DOT to Maintainers
Would the DOT offer introductions to some of the maintainers or organizations that upkeep the existing incomplete datasets mentioned at https://its.dot.gov/csai/datasets_externalLink.html?
1 vote -
Scope of the decision support tool?
Should the decision support tool we're developing for this project aim to cover all three aspects outlined in Appendix A: identifying gaps, proposing solutions to fill those gaps, and evaluating the potential impact of those solutions comprehensively? Alternatively, would it be sufficient for the tool to focus on addressing a specific urgent issue within the network, such as bike safety, thereby improving the overall quality of the complete streets network?
5 votes -
Focus on data, or the decision making tool?
Is the focus of the SBIR the data generation or the decision making tool? The presolicitation talks about both. However, without the underlying data available, we cannot build a good decision making tool, especially the NLP examples given. Is DoT looking for easy to use decision making tools, or the tools to fill in the missing data elements?
7 votes -
Data for Phase I - are we expected to use best available data for the selected geography?
It appears that the budget for Phase I will likely cover utilizing best available data elements for a selected geography and may not allow procuring or testing new data sources. Please clarify if novel data sources are meant to be applied in Phase II or later.
2 votes -
Why no data detail for freight needs (e.g. unobstructed vertical clearance) other than freight volume counts in Table 2?
While the Complete Streets AI Initiative Pre-Solicitation mentions freight five times, why no mention of freight data / goods movement / waste-recycling needs in the Table 2 list of data elements other than freight vehicle volume and type data? Roadway characteristics important for freight such as unobstructed vertical clearances, turning radii for freight vehicles, etc. are missing. Can these omissions be corrected in the resulting solicitation to remove bias against freight needs?
2 votes -
Prompt and Output
Examples 1 and 2 in APPENDIX A show “prompt” and “output” in the form of text and descriptions of imagery. Further, the expected Phase II outcomes list includes “perform[ing] analysis in response to queries from users.”
Does the decision software tool need a natural language query interface?
2 votes -
Novel Data Coverage
APPENDIX A states “The outcome of Phase I shall be a proof-of-concept report, as well as the digital data layers that have been generated for the chosen geographic region… [and shall include an] assessment of data coverage limitations and gaps”
Can you elaborate on how important the percentage of coverage is for the novel generated, enhanced, and integrated data elements within the geographic region during Phase 1? All other things being equal, do you have a sense if you’d rather see offeror select a small densely populated area or a sprawling geographic area for Phase 1?
2 votes -
Data Ownership Rights
APPENDIX A states “The data and methodologies generated from this initiative that reflect existing bicycle, pedestrian, and accessibility infrastructure shall be hosted publicly in an open and accessible format” — Can you expand on this? Will this be a carveout of data ownership rights? How long will this data be publicly hosted on whose servers?
6 votes -
Contiguous Geographic Areas
As long as it meets the stated summary requirements, can Phase 1’s contiguous geographic area be arbitrarily defined by the offeror?
2 votes -
Working with small business.
Numerous companies that would not be defined as small businesses collect or could collect data that can be used to help develop the tool that this project is seeking. Will Volpe consider curating a list of companies that could be partners to a small business looking to develop the desired tool(s).
3 votes -
What intellectual property (IP) rights will apply to the data and software deliverables produced in different phases
For phase II's beta software tool, what level of access and usage rights does the DoT expect from companies (government pupose rights, unlimited rights, or negotiated licenses)?
What are the potential(expected) licensing options for the fully functional software developed in phase III (consider commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) licensing or the DoT wants the IP rights)? What are the DoT's long-term goals for ownership and operation of the phase III software?
Pre-existing IP: if companies use pre-existing IP in their deliverables, can you clarify ownership and licensing rights for those components?
7 votes -
Does the DOT have a list of Metro transit agencies or Regional Planning organizations who would be willing to work with Small businesses pla
Does the DOT have a list of Metro transit agencies or Regional Planning organizations who would be willing to work with Small businesses as part of this topic ?
3 votes -
Road Weather & Conditions
I don't see weather/road conditions as Context data elements to generate or enhance. Is that data element intentionally not included and is it a data element that should be included as it impacts safety, efficiency, etc.?
5 votes