Pavle Bujanovic
My feedback
3 results found
-
2 votes1 comment · U.S. DOT FY 2024.1 Phase I Pre-Solicitation Q&A » 24-FH1: Next-Generation Sensing and Communication Technology for Cooperative Driving Automation · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 vote1 comment · U.S. DOT FY 2024.1 Phase I Pre-Solicitation Q&A » 24-FH1: Next-Generation Sensing and Communication Technology for Cooperative Driving Automation · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Pavle Bujanovic
commented
1. This is a nice to have, but not a requirement. However, the sensor must be demonstrated on some vehicle and/or infrastructure combination (preferably both).
2. The sensing range ought to be comparable to current sensors found on L3+ vehicles.
3. The Contractor may propose either. However, all other things being equal, priority will be given to the proposal that uses 5G NR as the latency benchmark. -
1 vote1 comment · U.S. DOT FY 2024.1 Phase I Pre-Solicitation Q&A » 24-FH1: Next-Generation Sensing and Communication Technology for Cooperative Driving Automation · Admin →
An error occurred while saving the comment Pavle Bujanovic
commented
1. The goal is to develop a small sensor that can, with minimal computational burden, accurately sense/track other relevant objects of choice and that can also communicate with other transportation entities (e.g., vehicles or infrastructure) with a minimum burden on the communication network.
2. All the answers provided in this question are part of what is needed, in reverse order in terms of priority. Also important is a small form factor.
3. No, it is reasonable to assume that such a device will be expensive initially but the price will decrease over time.
1. The sensing range ought to be comparable to current sensors found on L3+ vehicles.
2. The government is open to considering such a proposal but that fact in and of itself provides nothing novel. It is expected that the rest of the proposal would communicate the novelty behind the approach.
3. This spectrum is typically reserved for public safety agencies and authorized government entities to support emergency and public safety communications. Since the goal is to create something that would be deployable on all vehicles (public and private), the government does not recommend this approach, but would need to know additional details about the proposal before making a final judgement.