26-PH2 mentions " it may consider ceramic-based coatings, polymer composites, or nanoenhanced paints that would integrate temperature-sensi
it may consider ceramic-based coatings, polymer composites, or nanoenhanced paints that would integrate temperature-sensitive pigments... The topic clearly talks about color changing but are changes in surface character such as roughness also in scope for response? Also, is there any degree of "Resolution"? Are 50F increments adequate? Also is peak temperature indication important or is the only interest "Current" temperature?
pat bahn
shared this idea
-
Andrew Leyder
commented
The proposed technology primarily seeks a visible thermochromic color change system. Changes in surface character, such as roughness or texture, may be considered in scope as secondary or supplemental indicators, but they should not replace the required visible color-change function.
The proposed technology is not limited to current-temperature indication. While the desired color change may be irreversible or long-lasting, a peak-temperature or temperature range indication is in scope and may be especially useful for post-incident assessment. Offerors should explain whether their system indicates the current temperature, the maximum temperature reached, or a range threshold, and how that information would be interpreted by responders and operators.