V2X advisories and high-intensity visual warnings
Is a corridor-level RSU deployment that delivers location-specific V2X advisories and high-intensity visual warnings to vehicles approaching a detected safety event — such as a wrong-way driver, stalled vehicle, or work zone intrusion — considered responsive to the congestion prevention and mitigation scope of topic 26-FH1, even where the primary benefit metric is conflict reduction and incident prevention rather than travel time reduction alone?
Jason Weaver
shared this idea
-
V2X advisories and high-intensity visual warnings Is a corridor-level RSU deployment that delivers location-specific V2X advisories and high-intensity visual warnings to vehicles approaching a detected safety event — such as a wrong-way driver, stalled vehicle, or work zone intrusion — considered responsive to the congestion prevention and mitigation scope of topic 26-FH1, even where the primary benefit metric is conflict reduction and incident prevention rather than travel time reduction alone? This topic focuses primarily on mitigating traffic congestion, while incorporating related benefits like conflict reduction and incident prevention is acceptable.
