Corridors where no existing RSU infrastructure is present
For a proposer deploying new RSU infrastructure on rural interstate corridors where no existing RSU infrastructure is present, is the strong justification requirement satisfied by demonstrating: (1) absence of existing RSU coverage on the target corridor, (2) solar-powered off-grid installation requiring no civil works, (3) full interoperability with the existing connected vehicle fleet via standard SAE J2735 messaging, and (4) integration with existing state DOT TMC data systems via standard TIM message exchange?
Jason Weaver
shared this idea
-
The coordination concept assumes that only the sender side has a broader, system-level view of congestion conditions across the network. As such, the sender side is responsible for higher-level coordination across multiple local AI agents to advise receiver's behavior and optimize overall traffic states. It emphasizes sender-side orchestration where available global or regional context is used to generate and distribute coordinated advisories to the receiver side so that improve network-wide traffic conditions.
Please see: https://usdot.uservoice.com/forums/967226/suggestions/51257020
