Skip to content

U.S. DOT FY 2026 Phase I Pre-Solicitation Q&A



5/29/26 Update: The Pre-solicitation is now closed. Topic questions are no longer being accepted. * * *

This U.S. DOT Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Pre-solicitation Q&A Forum provides small businesses an opportunity to submit clarifying questions on the topics published in the U.S. DOT Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Phase I Pre-Solicitation. Questions will be answered by the Technical Experts/Topic Authors at the U.S. DOT Operating Administrations during this period. Questions shall be limited to improving the understanding of a particular topic's requirements and should not share proposal ideas nor proprietary information.

The U.S. DOT’s FY 2026 Pre-Solicitation period is April 29, 2026, through May 29, 2026, at 5:00 pm Eastern Time (ET). Only questions posted within this period will be responded to.

How to Use the SBIR Pre-solicitation Q&A Forum:

Register : Anyone can view questions but registration is required if you wish to post a question and receive a notification when it is responded to.
  1. To create a new account or to sign in with an existing account please click on “sign in” located at the top right of the page
  2. A new pop-up window will open to make a selection, you can use an existing Google or Facebook account to access the site or you might select to create a new account.
  3. If you choose to access UserVoice with an existing Google or Microsoft account, you will be required to enter your login credentials for Google or Microsoft and agree to terms of service
  4. If you need to create a new account, click "Create an Account" underneath the password box
  5. In the next screen, type in the e-mail and click "Verify E-mail".
  6. Navigate to your inbox and click the link within the e-mail to verify. The link will be generated by noreply@trymagic.com
  7. That link will be live for 20 minutes. Once that time elapses, you will have to request another one
  8. Navigate back to UserVoice, and you will need to provide your name, a password, and agree to terms of service and storage permissions. Click "Create Account".
Search: Browse the existing questions by category to find the topic you are interested in and to see if your question has already been addressed. If you see a question, you are also interested in, you can add a vote to the question, or leave a comment.

Post: If your question has not already been posted, use the “Type your technical question” box at the bottom of the page to enter your question.
  1. Select the research topic your question is related to from the drop-down menu that appears when you begin typing.
  2. You may add more detail in the Description box (optional). Do NOT attach any files. The U.S. DOT shall not consider any submitted materials other than questions.
  3. Enter your e-mail address and password.
  4. When finished, select “Post idea.” If you registered, you will be able to track responses to your post. Please include only one question or comment per post to help us keep the forum organized.
Please note, all comments will be public information. Potential offerors shall not include in the question(s) or comment(s) any information that they do not wish to be made public. Telephone inquiries or meeting requests will not be addressed and may be removed. The U.S. DOT shall not respond to requests for advice or guidance on any offeror’s solution to any SBIR topic and shall not consider any submitted materials other than questions.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

45 results found

  1. Private-Sector Use Case

    For Topic 26-OS2, may a private-sector freight operator, logistics provider, or transportation management environment serve as the primary Phase I use case if the solution is designed for future integration with public-sector corridor management systems?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  2. Model Baseline and Delay Definition

    For Topic 26-OS2, should applicants compare the predictive model against a specific baseline and use a preferred definition of “freight delay,” such as travel time increase, missed delivery window, dwell time, congestion probability, or route deviation?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  3. Commercial Freight Data

    For Topic 26-OS2, are aggregated, anonymized, or proprietary commercial freight datasets acceptable for Phase I model development if carrier, customer, and shipment confidentiality are protected and data limitations are documented?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  4. Corridor Type and Scale

    For Topic 26-OS2, does DOT have a preferred type or scale of Phase I corridor, such as urban, rural, intermodal, port-related, manufacturing, cross-border-adjacent, or nationally significant interstate freight corridors?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  5. International Trade Corridor Impacts

    For Topic 26-OS2, may a Phase I proof of concept account for Canada/Mexico border-adjacent congestion, customs-related dwell time, or cross-border freight disruption variables if the model remains focused on a selected U.S. freight corridor or segment?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  6. Interoperability / Architecture

    For Topic 26-OS2, are there preferred interoperability standards, data schemas, APIs, geospatial formats, or architecture expectations for compatibility with State DOT systems, commercial telematics platforms, freight carrier systems, and visualization tools such as ArcGIS, Power BI, or Tableau?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  7. Synthetic / Simulated Data

    For Topic 26-OS2, may Phase I applicants use synthetic freight datasets or simulated corridor conditions when live operational data is not yet available, provided the proposal documents assumptions, limitations, and a validation approach?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  8. Would DOT consider a topic on hardware-level cargo authentication technology for trailers and rail containers?

    Would DOT consider a topic on hardware-level cargo authentication technology for trailers and rail containers? Cargo theft is a multi-hundred million dollar problem in the US and the CORCA bill identified a gap in physical security at the asset level. More advanced authentication locks that operate 100% offline have no current representation in the SBIR portfolio.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  9. For the Desired Outcome “Commercial and Implementation Readiness Assessment"

    For the Desired Outcome “Commercial and Implementation Readiness Assessment”, what constitutes the minimum acceptable evidence of a commercialisation pathway — a Letter of Interest from a single state DOT or logistics partner, or are commitments from multiple stakeholders expected at Phase I?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  10. For Technical Parameter TP-4 (federated learning)

    For Technical Parameter TP-4 (federated learning): does Phase I require a live multi-party FL deployment involving distinct legal entities sharing model updates, or is a simulated federation — two data partitions on the same infrastructure representing separate jurisdictions — sufficient as a Phase I architecture demonstration?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  11. Technical Parameter TP-1 requires deploying “low-power edge AI devices at strategic freight bottlenecks.

    Technical Parameter TP-1 requires deploying “low-power edge AI devices at strategic freight bottlenecks.” For Phase I, is a benchtop hardware prototype or hardware-in-the-loop simulation of the edge device sufficient to demonstrate technical feasibility, or does Phase I require actual field deployment at a freight interchange?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  12. For Technical Parameter TP-3 (synthetic data generation), does the DOT expect the generator to produce freight-domain-specific

    For Technical Parameter TP-3 (synthetic data generation), does the DOT expect the generator to produce freight-domain-specific synthetic trajectories and delay events, or is general-purpose tabular synthetic data augmentation acceptable as a Phase I implementation of this capability?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  13. For the Freight Corridor Predictive Intelligence topic, is preference given to solutions that provide dual functionality — simultaneously mo

    For the Freight Corridor Predictive Intelligence topic, is preference given to solutions that provide dual functionality — simultaneously monitoring both commercial vehicle health and the structural integrity of the weigh station platform itself using the same sensor array?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  14. Data integration plan — strategy document or working ingest pipelines?

    Is this more of a strategy document, or do you want to see working ingest pipelines for at least some of the data sources by the end?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  15. Digital twin expectation — microsimulation, generative AI, or existing platform integration?

    For the digital twin piece — are you thinking more along the lines of physics-based microsimulation (Aimsun, SUMO, Vissim), or a generative AI model trained on real corridor traces? And is the program open to building on top of an existing digital-twin platform, or would you rather see something built from scratch?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  16. Priority among data sources, and are licensed feeds (NPMRDS, ATRI) government-furnished?

    Is there a priority order on the data sources? We're weighing NPMRDS, ATRI, state WIM, FAF, TPIMS, and connected vehicle BSMs, and it'd help to know which ones the program sees as most important. Also, for the licensed ones like NPMRDS and ATRI — are those typically furnished to awardees, or should we plan to budget for them?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  17. Clarification on 80% accuracy target — spatial unit and error metric?

    Quick clarification on the 80% accuracy target for 30–60 minute forecasts — is that measured at the segment level, at specific bottlenecks, or across full origin-destination pairs? And what error metric are you using? Whether it's MAPE on travel time vs. classification accuracy on a congestion label changes the modeling approach quite a bit.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  18. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  19. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  20. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea