Skip to content

Jeff Dressel

My feedback

9 results found

  1. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Dressel commented  · 

    Such access is not planned or within scope for this effort.

  2. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Dressel commented  · 

    For this effort, the intent is something akin to a 'tech demo,' and as such, respondents need not be burdened with collection of sensor data, if such data can be obtained (or is already possessed) pre-recorded, with permission to use in such an R&D application. As such, the decision of whether to use data that is real-time, pre-recorded, or both, and the decision of where in the data pipeline to process such data, is at the discretion of the respondent.

  3. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Dressel commented  · 

    The target performance requirements/goals (Section 1.c) describe overt, visually observable state metrics (e.g., hands on wheel, PERCLOS, gaze direction), however, proposals describing additional internal state metrics are welcomed.

  4. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Dressel commented  · 

    This project is led by NHTSA, and as such the principal application of interest is for drivers of passenger vehicles, however, respondents may propose a system for any driver. Internal and external sensor systems exist for a variety of vehicles; this SBIR seeks to investigate whether such systems (or newly developed or modified systems) are capable of being correlated or combined in a way to estimate driver response to, or awareness of, changes in the driving environment.

  5. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Dressel commented  · 

    The intent, especially with Phase II goals, is to correlate/combine things like what you describe (perhaps with greater visual angle precision with regard to eyetracking) with external sensing, to inform an estimate of driver responses to, or awareness of, changes in the driving environment (e.g., traffic, hazards).

  6. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Dressel commented  · 

    No suggestions have been generated at this time. Any level of modification - including no modification - is acceptable, with the goal of reaching the performance targets.

  7. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Dressel commented  · 

    At your discretion, such a response would be welcome. However, we would need to evaluate the proposal within the stated scope of interest (i.e., both objectives, internal and external)

  8. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Dressel commented  · 

    The solution could involve development of a low level, real-time algorithm, embedded into a camera system, but need not specifically. The notional functional requirement, if you will, is that the system(s) have capabilities of sensing: (1) the environment (traffic, objects) surrounding the vehicle, and (2) driver drowsiness, inattention, and incapacitation. This can be demonstrated with either real-time data (e.g., from a sensor) or pre-recorded data (i.e., not real-time).

  9. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jeff Dressel commented  · 

    Thank you for the excellent question. In this instance, for this particular effort, we intend to exclude V2X solutions from the scope. As you noted, for this effort, we will focus on onboard/local processing.

    Jeff Dressel supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base