U.S. DOT FY 2026 Phase I Pre-Solicitation Q&A
- To create a new account or to sign in with an existing account please click on “sign in” located at the top right of the page
- A new pop-up window will open to make a selection, you can use an existing Google or Facebook account to access the site or you might select to create a new account.
- If you choose to access UserVoice with an existing Google or Microsoft account, you will be required to enter your login credentials for Google or Microsoft and agree to terms of service
- If you need to create a new account, click "Create an Account" underneath the password box
- In the next screen, type in the e-mail and click "Verify E-mail".
- Navigate to your inbox and click the link within the e-mail to verify. The link will be generated by noreply@trymagic.com
- That link will be live for 20 minutes. Once that time elapses, you will have to request another one
- Navigate back to UserVoice, and you will need to provide your name, a password, and agree to terms of service and storage permissions. Click "Create Account".
- Select the research topic your question is related to from the drop-down menu that appears when you begin typing.
- You may add more detail in the Description box (optional). Do NOT attach any files. The U.S. DOT shall not consider any submitted materials other than questions.
- Enter your e-mail address and password.
- When finished, select “Post idea.” If you registered, you will be able to track responses to your post. Please include only one question or comment per post to help us keep the forum organized.
229 results found
-
Specific Transportation Management Center integration
The topic mentions "operational strategies to a Transportation Management Center (TMC), and function as a complementary component to enhance existing traffic congestion management." Does DOT have specific TMC platforms or open standards in mind for integration (e.g., NTCIP, TMDD, ATMS systems)? Is integration with at least one specific commercial TMS / ATMS platform required for Phase I?
1 vote -
Output advisory formats and rendering
Phase I requires "delivering human-centric advisories." Are advisories expected in a single format (e.g., text-only OBU display) or across multiple modalities (text, voice, visual cues, vehicle dashboard integration, mobile app push)? Is integration with consumer mobile applications (e.g., Apple CarPlay, Android Auto, Waze) considered in scope?
1 vote -
Outbound-only broadcast vs bidirectional V2X
Are proposals using a one-way broadcast architecture (infrastructure-to-vehicle, no inbound from vehicles) considered responsive, given that it eliminates handshake latency and reduces cybersecurity exposure? Or does the topic require bidirectional V2X consistent with SAE J2735 / 3GPP Release 16 standards?
1 vote -
Communication technology stack flexibility
The topic mentions "ready-to-implement secure V2X communication (such as C-V2X (5G/4G/LTE), Satellite, etc.) or other communication technologies." Is there a preference among these, or is the choice left to the proposer? Are proposals using novel or proprietary communication mechanisms (provided they meet documented latency and security requirements) considered responsive?
1 vote -
Hardware-in-the-loop testbed expectations
Phase I requires hardware-in-the-loop simulation testing. Are commercial HIL platforms (e.g., dSPACE, NI VeriStand, CARLA + ROS2) acceptable, or does DOT have a preferred testbed? Is virtual-only simulation acceptable in cases where the architecture is purely software / firmware, or is physical hardware integration required for Phase I?
1 vote -
Phase I human factors testing depth
Phase I deliverables include "human-centric design" and human factors testing of advisory messaging. Is the expected depth a small-N usability study within the proof-of-concept (e.g., 5 to 10 participants for comprehension testing), or a statistically powered human factors experiment? Approximately what budget allocation does DOT expect for the human factors component within the Phase I budget cap?
1 vote -
New infrastructure deployment
The topic encourages leveraging existing infrastructure (legacy fixed-point detectors, RSUs, third-party feeds). Are proposals deploying new sensing infrastructure (e.g., next-generation roadside units with multi-modal sensing) considered responsive, provided they are designed to interoperate with existing legacy data and fit within the Phase I budget envelope?
1 vote -
Multi-agent coordination scope
Topic uncertainty #5 names "how to seamlessly coordinate between multiple local-AI agents to achieve network-wide benefits" as an open question. Does this include sender-side coordination methods (i.e., proactive state propagation between agents before an event), or is the expected scope limited to receiver-side reactive coordination?
1 vote -
Architecture: edge-distributed mesh vs cloud-edge
The topic description states "the technical approach envisioned for this SBIR topic aligns with this latter category, which is cloud-edge computing." Would proposals using a fully edge-distributed mesh of perception nodes (with cloud aggregation reserved for non-real-time analytics, model training, and longer-horizon prediction) be considered responsive to this topic, or is a centralized cloud-edge split required?
1 vote