Skip to content

Admindotsbir@dot.gov (SBIR/Volpe, Department of Transportation)

My feedback

117 results found

  1. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Yes, aggregated, simulated, and test data would all be appropriate for a feasibility concept demonstration.

  2. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    The Government cannot provide specific guidance on proposal strategy. It will be the offeror's responsibility to propose the solution that best meets requirements within the forthcoming solicitation

  3. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    The Government cannot provide specific guidance on proposal strategy. It will be the offeror's responsibility to propose the solution that best meets requirements within the forthcoming solicitation.

  4. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    The Government cannot provide specific guidance on proposal strategy. It will be the offeror's responsibility to propose the solution that best meets requirements within the forthcoming solicitation

  5. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Phase I is intended to demonstrate a feasibility concept and we expect the proposal to comply with the privacy framework necessary to protect any data being used during the feasibility concept demonstration. The proposal should have a plan to come into compliance with all USDOT requirements prior to a potential deployment.

    In regards to the data elements, the Government cannot provide specific guidance on proposal strategy. It will be the offeror's responsibility to propose the solution that best meets requirements within the forthcoming solicitation.

  6. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Beyond the predictive model accuracy for Phase II readiness, proposed solutions should offer a scalable conceptual architecture that is compatible with existing enterprise decision-support platforms and public-sector workflows. The resulting system should function seamlessly within existing agency systems and workflows, rather than serving as a standalone, isolated analytics tool. Specifically, the Phase I "Conceptual Architecture and System Design" should define an approach for a "cloud-hosted, web and mobile accessible decision-support dashboard". In addition, the Phase I "Data Inventory and Integration Plan," should document the project’s data integration strategy, including access methods, data availability, and preprocessing steps. Conducting a "Commercial and Implementation Readiness Assessment" is an additional Phase I output. Effectively evaluating commercialization pathways, partnerships, and integration opportunities with state DOTs, MPOs, and logistics data providers will serve as key evidence that the proposed solution is aligned with real-world stakeholder workflows.

  7. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    USDOT does not mandate a specific preferred type or scale of freight corridor for the Phase I proof-of-concept. Similarly, during Phase II, the specific geographic selection for pilot corridors is proposer-defined based on partner availability and operational feasibility. For Phase II, applicants will conduct field pilots along 2–3 representative freight corridors that encompass urban, rural, and intermodal environments. Corridor selection should align with the required Phase II stakeholder partnerships.

  8. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Phase I is intended to demonstrate a feasibility concept with a clear path toward a fully compliant and operational system.

    The Government cannot provide specific guidance on proposal strategy. It will be the offeror's responsibility to propose the solution that best meets requirements within the forthcoming solicitation.

  9. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    It is not intended for the responder to own and operate vehicles.

  10. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Yes, safety-assured ISO 26262 software may be used.

    The Government cannot provide specific guidance on proposal strategy. It will be the offeror's responsibility to propose the solution that best meets requirements within the forthcoming solicitation

  11. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    The Government cannot provide specific guidance on proposal strategy. It will be the offeror's responsibility to propose the solution that best meets requirements within the forthcoming solicitation.

  12. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    A simulated federation is sufficient for a Phase I architecture demonstration; a live multi-party federated learning deployment involving distinct legal entities is not required until Phase II. For Phase I, the primary deliverable is to demonstrate a functional predictive AI architecture and build a preliminary model (proof of concept) for a selected freight corridor or segment using combined real-world and synthetic datasets. The actual implementation of federated capabilities to enable distributed model learning and real-time processing (while preserving data privacy) is identified as a Phase II outcome.

  13. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Informal discussions and identifying specific potential partners are sufficient to meet the baseline requirements for Phase I. Demonstrating a higher level of partner commitment during Phase I would help establish a proposal’s overall readiness for Phase II.

  14. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    There is no requirement on approach for this aspect. It will be the offeror's responsibility to propose the solution that best meets requirements within the solicitation.

  15. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    There is no specific requirement for this aspect. It will be the offeror's responsibility to propose the test scale that best meets requirements within the solicitation.

  16. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    IRB-approved human-subjects testing is expected.

  17. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    PHMSA expects the Phase I project to showcase the technical feasibility of a temperature-indicating coating to accurately reflect or correlate with the internal temperature of a packaging. The agency does not mandate a specific testing standard or methodology (such as direct-flame vs. radiant-panel testing) during the Phase I period of performance. It is entirely at the discretion of the offeror to determine, justify, and execute the most appropriate testing methods to demonstrate their coating's proof-of-concept, feasibility, and threshold-response repeatability.

  18. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Models should provide understandable, transparent reasons for their assessments, fostering confidence and collaboration between technology providers, carriers, and safety officials.

  19. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    The intended outcome of Phase I is a proof-of-concept system design, to include a validated framework, an initial prototype design, and supporting analyses demonstrating concept feasibility.

  20. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    An error occurred while saving the comment

    Are public transit operators (bus, light rail) considered eligible intended recipients for V2X advisories under this topic? Are public transit operators (bus, light rail) considered eligible intended recipients for V2X advisories under this topic, alongside private vehicles and Transportation Management Centers?