Skip to content

U.S. DOT FY 2026 Phase I Pre-Solicitation Q&A



This U.S. DOT Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Pre-solicitation Q&A Forum provides small businesses an opportunity to submit clarifying questions on the topics published in the U.S. DOT Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Phase I Pre-Solicitation. Questions will be answered by the Technical Experts/Topic Authors at the U.S. DOT Operating Administrations during this period. Questions shall be limited to improving the understanding of a particular topic's requirements and should not share proposal ideas nor proprietary information.

The U.S. DOT’s FY 2026 Pre-Solicitation period is April 29, 2026, through May 29, 2026, at 5:00 pm Eastern Time (ET). Only questions posted within this period will be responded to.

How to Use the SBIR Pre-solicitation Q&A Forum:

Register : Anyone can view questions but registration is required if you wish to post a question and receive a notification when it is responded to.
  1. To create a new account or to sign in with an existing account please click on “sign in” located at the top right of the page
  2. A new pop-up window will open to make a selection, you can use an existing Google or Facebook account to access the site or you might select to create a new account.
  3. If you choose to access UserVoice with an existing Google or Microsoft account, you will be required to enter your login credentials for Google or Microsoft and agree to terms of service
  4. If you need to create a new account, click "Create an Account" underneath the password box
  5. In the next screen, type in the e-mail and click "Verify E-mail".
  6. Navigate to your inbox and click the link within the e-mail to verify. The link will be generated by noreply@trymagic.com
  7. That link will be live for 20 minutes. Once that time elapses, you will have to request another one
  8. Navigate back to UserVoice, and you will need to provide your name, a password, and agree to terms of service and storage permissions. Click "Create Account".
Search: Browse the existing questions by category to find the topic you are interested in and to see if your question has already been addressed. If you see a question, you are also interested in, you can add a vote to the question, or leave a comment.

Post: If your question has not already been posted, use the “Type your technical question” box at the bottom of the page to enter your question.
  1. Select the research topic your question is related to from the drop-down menu that appears when you begin typing.
  2. You may add more detail in the Description box (optional). Do NOT attach any files. The U.S. DOT shall not consider any submitted materials other than questions.
  3. Enter your e-mail address and password.
  4. When finished, select “Post idea.” If you registered, you will be able to track responses to your post. Please include only one question or comment per post to help us keep the forum organized.
Please note, all comments will be public information. Potential offerors shall not include in the question(s) or comment(s) any information that they do not wish to be made public. Telephone inquiries or meeting requests will not be addressed and may be removed. The U.S. DOT shall not respond to requests for advice or guidance on any offeror’s solution to any SBIR topic and shall not consider any submitted materials other than questions.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

90 results found

  1. Would a human-centered safety communication system that generates real-time visual warning signals (based on braking behavior and environmen

    The system I am developing focuses on proactive accident prevention by providing immediate, human-visible signals to surrounding drivers and pedestrians.

    In addition to visual signaling, the system integrates environmental awareness (e.g., stop sign detection via GPS) to anticipate potential risk situations and provide advance warning.

    I would like to understand whether such human-generated and behavior-based signaling systems can be recognized as a valid input or complementary component within predictive safety analytics frameworks.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Catch Basin Observation system requirements

    Is it required that the catch basin observation sensor-package base station be attached to a human operated vehicle? Are the the crash atenuator and sensor boom strictly necessary, or are other solutions to measuring catch-basin water, sediment, trash levels, and conditions such as clogging and
    stormwater ponding- acceptable?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Small business submitting more than one Phase I proposal l to the same SBIR topic

    "May a single small business submit more than one Phase I proposal to the same SBIR topic, provided each proposes a technically distinct approach?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. 26-PH2 mentions " it may consider ceramic-based coatings, polymer composites, or nanoenhanced paints that would integrate temperature-sensi

    it may consider ceramic-based coatings, polymer composites, or nanoenhanced paints that would integrate temperature-sensitive pigments... The topic clearly talks about color changing but are changes in surface character such as roughness also in scope for response? Also, is there any degree of "Resolution"? Are 50F increments adequate? Also is peak temperature indication important or is the only interest "Current" temperature?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Does 26-OS1 cover intrastate operations under 500 miles, or only interstate long-haul?

    OST-R's topic description references "commercial freight." Does this include intrastate operations under 500 miles, or is the focus on long-haul interstate corridors? Our deployment target includes regional distribution networks — clarifying the operational scope will determine whether 26-OS1 or 26-FH1 is the stronger fit.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Does Phase I cover Class 2–8 (cargo vans to semi-trucks), or only Class 7–8 heavy freight?

    Regarding vehicle weight class eligibility for Phase I demonstrations — does "commercial vehicle" encompass Class 2–8 (cargo vans through semi-trucks), or is the focus limited to Class 7–8 heavy freight? Our platform currently serves the full spectrum of regulated commercial vehicles, and we'd like to ensure the solicitation accommodates mid-size fleet operators before committing to a Phase I proposal scope.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. For the “Trusted Intermediary” design, must the Phase I architecture address compliance with a specific federal privacy framework

    For the “Trusted Intermediary” design, must the Phase I architecture address compliance with a specific federal privacy framework (e.g., NIST Privacy Framework, FISMA, CCPA-equivalent), or may proposers define their own privacy protection approach aligned with the spirit of the topic?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. For Focus Area 5 (Comprehensive Health Modeling)

    For Focus Area 5 (Comprehensive Health Modeling), does Phase I require a working model trained on real fleet maintenance records, or is a design of how maintenance and environmental data would be integrated into the predictive model acceptable as a Phase I deliverable?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. The topic references ISO/PAS 8800 and the proposed SELF DRIVE Act of 2026 in its reference list.

    The topic references ISO/PAS 8800 and the proposed SELF DRIVE Act of 2026 in its reference list. Are proposals expected to demonstrate formal compliance with these standards in Phase I, or is an alignment statement showing that the proposed architecture is designed to support these standards sufficient?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Focus Area 1 describes a “Trusted Intermediary” built on voluntary industry data.

    Focus Area 1 describes a “Trusted Intermediary” built on voluntary industry data. In Phase I, does the DOT expect the architecture to include a functional voluntary consent and data-contribution mechanism, or is a design specification of how such a mechanism would work sufficient?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Would DOT consider a topic on hardware-level cargo authentication technology for trailers and rail containers?

    Would DOT consider a topic on hardware-level cargo authentication technology for trailers and rail containers? Cargo theft is a multi-hundred million dollar problem in the US and the CORCA bill identified a gap in physical security at the asset level. More advanced authentication locks that operate 100% offline have no current representation in the SBIR portfolio.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Phase I Desired Outcomes specify “a proof-of-concept system design” and “an initial prototype design"

    Phase I Desired Outcomes specify “a proof-of-concept system design” and “an initial prototype design”. Does the Phase I evaluation require a functional software prototype with running code producing outputs, or is a detailed system design document with a limited simulation scenario (no live data feeds) acceptable as the Phase I prototype?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. For the Desired Outcome “Commercial and Implementation Readiness Assessment"

    For the Desired Outcome “Commercial and Implementation Readiness Assessment”, what constitutes the minimum acceptable evidence of a commercialisation pathway — a Letter of Interest from a single state DOT or logistics partner, or are commitments from multiple stakeholders expected at Phase I?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. For Technical Parameter TP-4 (federated learning)

    For Technical Parameter TP-4 (federated learning): does Phase I require a live multi-party FL deployment involving distinct legal entities sharing model updates, or is a simulated federation — two data partitions on the same infrastructure representing separate jurisdictions — sufficient as a Phase I architecture demonstration?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Technical Parameter TP-1 requires deploying “low-power edge AI devices at strategic freight bottlenecks.

    Technical Parameter TP-1 requires deploying “low-power edge AI devices at strategic freight bottlenecks.” For Phase I, is a benchtop hardware prototype or hardware-in-the-loop simulation of the edge device sufficient to demonstrate technical feasibility, or does Phase I require actual field deployment at a freight interchange?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. For Technical Parameter TP-3 (synthetic data generation), does the DOT expect the generator to produce freight-domain-specific

    For Technical Parameter TP-3 (synthetic data generation), does the DOT expect the generator to produce freight-domain-specific synthetic trajectories and delay events, or is general-purpose tabular synthetic data augmentation acceptable as a Phase I implementation of this capability?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Would a cell phone application to detect driver impairment fit under the 26-OS1 topic?

    We are developing a mobile application designed to help assess potential driver impairment (drunk, fatigued, etc.) through a verbal assessment test. The app allows users to securely sign in and answer a series of questions intended to gauge cognitive and verbal indicators of impairment. Based on the user’s responses, the application provides feedback indicating whether the results suggest possible impairment or not.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. For the Freight Corridor Predictive Intelligence topic, is preference given to solutions that provide dual functionality — simultaneously mo

    For the Freight Corridor Predictive Intelligence topic, is preference given to solutions that provide dual functionality — simultaneously monitoring both commercial vehicle health and the structural integrity of the weigh station platform itself using the same sensor array?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?