Skip to content

U.S. DOT FY 2026 Phase I Pre-Solicitation Q&A



5/29/26 Update: The Pre-solicitation is now closed. Topic questions are no longer being accepted. * * *

This U.S. DOT Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Pre-solicitation Q&A Forum provides small businesses an opportunity to submit clarifying questions on the topics published in the U.S. DOT Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Phase I Pre-Solicitation. Questions will be answered by the Technical Experts/Topic Authors at the U.S. DOT Operating Administrations during this period. Questions shall be limited to improving the understanding of a particular topic's requirements and should not share proposal ideas nor proprietary information.

The U.S. DOT’s FY 2026 Pre-Solicitation period is April 29, 2026, through May 29, 2026, at 5:00 pm Eastern Time (ET). Only questions posted within this period will be responded to.

How to Use the SBIR Pre-solicitation Q&A Forum:

Register : Anyone can view questions but registration is required if you wish to post a question and receive a notification when it is responded to.
  1. To create a new account or to sign in with an existing account please click on “sign in” located at the top right of the page
  2. A new pop-up window will open to make a selection, you can use an existing Google or Facebook account to access the site or you might select to create a new account.
  3. If you choose to access UserVoice with an existing Google or Microsoft account, you will be required to enter your login credentials for Google or Microsoft and agree to terms of service
  4. If you need to create a new account, click "Create an Account" underneath the password box
  5. In the next screen, type in the e-mail and click "Verify E-mail".
  6. Navigate to your inbox and click the link within the e-mail to verify. The link will be generated by noreply@trymagic.com
  7. That link will be live for 20 minutes. Once that time elapses, you will have to request another one
  8. Navigate back to UserVoice, and you will need to provide your name, a password, and agree to terms of service and storage permissions. Click "Create Account".
Search: Browse the existing questions by category to find the topic you are interested in and to see if your question has already been addressed. If you see a question, you are also interested in, you can add a vote to the question, or leave a comment.

Post: If your question has not already been posted, use the “Type your technical question” box at the bottom of the page to enter your question.
  1. Select the research topic your question is related to from the drop-down menu that appears when you begin typing.
  2. You may add more detail in the Description box (optional). Do NOT attach any files. The U.S. DOT shall not consider any submitted materials other than questions.
  3. Enter your e-mail address and password.
  4. When finished, select “Post idea.” If you registered, you will be able to track responses to your post. Please include only one question or comment per post to help us keep the forum organized.
Please note, all comments will be public information. Potential offerors shall not include in the question(s) or comment(s) any information that they do not wish to be made public. Telephone inquiries or meeting requests will not be addressed and may be removed. The U.S. DOT shall not respond to requests for advice or guidance on any offeror’s solution to any SBIR topic and shall not consider any submitted materials other than questions.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

229 results found

  1. Battery Specifications

    What battery chemistries (LFP, NMC, LCO), voltage ranges, and capacity sizes should proposers target for the Phase I proof of concept?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  2. Does the DOT have baseline data for all five proposed sensor modalities

    Will the baseline data for optical, LiDAR, RADAR, thermal, and radiation sensors relevant to the catch basin inspection be provided as Government-Furnished Information?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  3. What is the expected size of the sensor boom?

    Are there any dimensional constraints related to roadway clearance, vehicle footprint, or sensor proximity to the catch basins?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  4. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  5. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  6. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  7. What are the expected data deliverables

    Would it be raw sensor data, processed reports, GIS-integrated condition assessments, or a combination? Does the DOT have an existing asset management system or database that the inspection data must integrate with?

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  8. Beyond predictive model accuracy, what operational success criteria are most important to the Department for evaluating Phase II readiness,

    Beyond predictive model accuracy, what operational success criteria are most important to the Department for evaluating Phase II readiness, particularly regarding interoperability with existing DOT operational systems, dashboard environments, and stakeholder decision-making workflows?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  9. Does the Department have preferred characteristics for candidate pilot corridors in Phase II (e.g., port-centric, interstate freight, interm

    Does the Department have preferred characteristics for candidate pilot corridors in Phase II (e.g., port-centric, interstate freight, intermodal, rural supply chain corridors), or is corridor selection intended to be proposer-defined based on operational feasibility and partner availability?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  10. Public data for Phase I proof of concept

    For topic 26-OS2, will a Phase I proof of concept be considered responsive if it uses publicly available freight, traffic, weather, incident, work zone, and infrastructure datasets for the initial model, while identifying private freight or telematics data partnerships as part of the Phase II pilot plan?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  11. For Phase I proof-of-concept activities, does the Department anticipate facilitating access to any federal or state multimodal freight datas

    For Phase I proof-of-concept activities, does the Department anticipate facilitating access to any federal or state multimodal freight datasets, or should proposers assume responsibility for sourcing and integrating all public and private datasets independently?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  12. For 26-FH2, is vehicle road testing expected in Phase I or Phase II?

    Develop a low-cost mobile screening system that uses a modular multi-sensor array and AI processing to flag catch basins likely needing maintenance without opening the grate.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  13. Does the scope of 26-OS1 include compliance-focused predictive analytics tools targeting owner-operators and small commercial carriers?

    The topic description references "proactive safety indicators" derived from public safety records and voluntary industry data, with an emphasis on small carrier segments and explainable AI. We are exploring whether a Phase I proof-of-concept that uses FMCSA inspection and violation data to generate predictive compliance risk scores for individual owner-operators as a mechanism for early safety intervention falls within the intended scope of this topic. Alternatively, does DOT envision 26-OS1 as focused primarily on multi-carrier fleet telematics at the corridor or network level?

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  14. Non-AV Fleet Data as Primary Input

    Does 26-OS2 accept non-AV commercial vehicle telemetry as qualifying data inputs? Or is the topic scoped to connected infrastructure sources such as RSUs and V2I systems only?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  15. Annotated Safety Event Dataset as Phase I Deliverable

    Does the DOT expect Phase I to deliver a real-time operational alerting or dashboard product rather than AI training-ready data infrastructure?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  16. Data Source Eligibility

    Does 26-OS1 permit an asset-light, licensed fleet data model, or does the topic require the proposing small business to own and operate the vehicles generating the data?"

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  17. We have a new lithium battery extinguishing system under development. This is a water-based low-cost agent that suppresses lithium battery

    We have a new lithium battery extinguishing system under development. This is a water-based low-cost agent that suppresses lithium battery fires efficiently. It can be dispensed through fixed piping, in a fire extinguishing device or directly into a BEES or EV battery system making it easy-to-deploy. It can rapidly and reliably suppress lithium-ion battery fires. It is non-toxic and safe from a environmental and personal health perspective. Would this be a good candidate for 26-PH4: Improved Response to Lithium-ion Battery Fires?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  18. Topic 26-FT1 identifies rural and frontier areas as a key challenge for Complete Trip planning. Is a Phase I proof-of-concept scoped to a sm

    Topic 26-FT1 identifies rural and frontier areas as a key challenge for Complete Trip planning. Is a Phase I proof-of-concept scoped to a small urban or rural transit network considered equally responsive as one focused on a large metropolitan system, provided the technical approach is designed to scale?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  19. Expected fire-exposure test scope within Phase I

    For Phase I is bench-scale torch-fire / direct-flame impingement testing on coated coupons sufficient to demonstrate proof-of-concept and threshold-response repeatability, or does the agency expect any radiant-panel (e.g., per 49 CFR Part 178 Appendix B / ASTM E1354 cone calorimeter at defined heat fluxes) exposure to be included within the Phase I scope of work?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  20. Color-Difference Acceptance Criterion

    Would PHMSA accept a quantitative colorimetric criterion as the threshold for "visible and distinct" — for example, a CIELAB color difference of ΔE*ab ≥ 30 (or another agency-preferred value) between the pre-trigger and post-trigger states, measured per ASTM D2244 or equivalent?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea