Skip to content

U.S. DOT FY 2026 Phase I Pre-Solicitation Q&A



5/29/26 Update: The Pre-solicitation is now closed. Topic questions are no longer being accepted. * * *

This U.S. DOT Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Pre-solicitation Q&A Forum provides small businesses an opportunity to submit clarifying questions on the topics published in the U.S. DOT Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 Phase I Pre-Solicitation. Questions will be answered by the Technical Experts/Topic Authors at the U.S. DOT Operating Administrations during this period. Questions shall be limited to improving the understanding of a particular topic's requirements and should not share proposal ideas nor proprietary information.

The U.S. DOT’s FY 2026 Pre-Solicitation period is April 29, 2026, through May 29, 2026, at 5:00 pm Eastern Time (ET). Only questions posted within this period will be responded to.

How to Use the SBIR Pre-solicitation Q&A Forum:

Register : Anyone can view questions but registration is required if you wish to post a question and receive a notification when it is responded to.
  1. To create a new account or to sign in with an existing account please click on “sign in” located at the top right of the page
  2. A new pop-up window will open to make a selection, you can use an existing Google or Facebook account to access the site or you might select to create a new account.
  3. If you choose to access UserVoice with an existing Google or Microsoft account, you will be required to enter your login credentials for Google or Microsoft and agree to terms of service
  4. If you need to create a new account, click "Create an Account" underneath the password box
  5. In the next screen, type in the e-mail and click "Verify E-mail".
  6. Navigate to your inbox and click the link within the e-mail to verify. The link will be generated by noreply@trymagic.com
  7. That link will be live for 20 minutes. Once that time elapses, you will have to request another one
  8. Navigate back to UserVoice, and you will need to provide your name, a password, and agree to terms of service and storage permissions. Click "Create Account".
Search: Browse the existing questions by category to find the topic you are interested in and to see if your question has already been addressed. If you see a question, you are also interested in, you can add a vote to the question, or leave a comment.

Post: If your question has not already been posted, use the “Type your technical question” box at the bottom of the page to enter your question.
  1. Select the research topic your question is related to from the drop-down menu that appears when you begin typing.
  2. You may add more detail in the Description box (optional). Do NOT attach any files. The U.S. DOT shall not consider any submitted materials other than questions.
  3. Enter your e-mail address and password.
  4. When finished, select “Post idea.” If you registered, you will be able to track responses to your post. Please include only one question or comment per post to help us keep the forum organized.
Please note, all comments will be public information. Potential offerors shall not include in the question(s) or comment(s) any information that they do not wish to be made public. Telephone inquiries or meeting requests will not be addressed and may be removed. The U.S. DOT shall not respond to requests for advice or guidance on any offeror’s solution to any SBIR topic and shall not consider any submitted materials other than questions.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

229 results found

  1. For 26-OS2, may Phase I focus on a U.S. port-linked intermodal freight corridor using maritime data and AIS/port/canal indicators?

    Clarifying whether port-linked maritime freight flows are within scope when connected to a U.S. freight corridor. No proprietary data or proposal details are included.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  2. Clarification on Transportation Readiness Pathways Within Transportation Participation Ecosystems

    For Topic 26 FT1, can transportation readiness pathways, including pathways that support progression toward transportation independence, be considered part of broader transportation participation ecosystems when functioning as supplemental AI Infrastructure support to Complete Trip objectives?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  3. Clarification on Complete Trip Supplemental AI Support Systems

    For Topic 26 FT1, would AI systems that help people overcome barriers to transportation participation, improve transportation readiness, and coordinate transportation planning and scheduling be considered within scope if they support Complete Trip objectives as a supplemental tool?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  4. On-Edge Safety Monitoring One key component for this to succeed is real-time analysis of near-miss instances and unreasonable driving behavi

    On-Edge Safety Monitoring
    One key component for this to succeed is real-time analysis of near-miss instances and unreasonable driving behaviors that can also be used universally in other applications. Are on-edge, safety anomaly detectors included in the scope of this project, or is it only on AI-driven analytics? Can safety-assured ISO 26262 software also be used in support of ISO 21448 and ISO 8800 efforts?

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  5. Cybersecurity / Data Protection

    For Topic 26-OS2, are there preferred cybersecurity or data protection expectations for Phase I systems utilizing proprietary freight, telematics, or transportation operations data?

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  6. Corridor Segment Scope

    For Topic 26-OS2, may applicants focus Phase I on a defined operational segment, freight bottleneck, port-to-inland route, intermodal connector, or recurring freight lane, or is DOT expecting an entire interstate corridor?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  7. Private-Sector Use Case

    For Topic 26-OS2, may a private-sector freight operator, logistics provider, or transportation management environment serve as the primary Phase I use case if the solution is designed for future integration with public-sector corridor management systems?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  8. Model Baseline and Delay Definition

    For Topic 26-OS2, should applicants compare the predictive model against a specific baseline and use a preferred definition of “freight delay,” such as travel time increase, missed delivery window, dwell time, congestion probability, or route deviation?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  9. Commercial Freight Data

    For Topic 26-OS2, are aggregated, anonymized, or proprietary commercial freight datasets acceptable for Phase I model development if carrier, customer, and shipment confidentiality are protected and data limitations are documented?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  10. Corridor Type and Scale

    For Topic 26-OS2, does DOT have a preferred type or scale of Phase I corridor, such as urban, rural, intermodal, port-related, manufacturing, cross-border-adjacent, or nationally significant interstate freight corridors?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  11. International Trade Corridor Impacts

    For Topic 26-OS2, may a Phase I proof of concept account for Canada/Mexico border-adjacent congestion, customs-related dwell time, or cross-border freight disruption variables if the model remains focused on a selected U.S. freight corridor or segment?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  12. Interoperability / Architecture

    For Topic 26-OS2, are there preferred interoperability standards, data schemas, APIs, geospatial formats, or architecture expectations for compatibility with State DOT systems, commercial telematics platforms, freight carrier systems, and visualization tools such as ArcGIS, Power BI, or Tableau?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  13. Synthetic / Simulated Data

    For Topic 26-OS2, may Phase I applicants use synthetic freight datasets or simulated corridor conditions when live operational data is not yet available, provided the proposal documents assumptions, limitations, and a validation approach?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  14. Does topic 26-OS1 contemplate hardware-based safety solutions

    Does topic 26-OS1 contemplate hardware-based safety solutions that directly address CMV roof ice-shedding compliance, or is the scope limited to data analytics and software platforms?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  15. Catch Basin Observation system requirements

    Is it required that the catch basin observation sensor-package base station be attached to a human operated vehicle? Are the the crash atenuator and sensor boom strictly necessary, or are other solutions to measuring catch-basin water, sediment, trash levels, and conditions such as clogging and
    stormwater ponding- acceptable?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  16. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  17. 26-PH2 mentions " it may consider ceramic-based coatings, polymer composites, or nanoenhanced paints that would integrate temperature-sensi

    it may consider ceramic-based coatings, polymer composites, or nanoenhanced paints that would integrate temperature-sensitive pigments... The topic clearly talks about color changing but are changes in surface character such as roughness also in scope for response? Also, is there any degree of "Resolution"? Are 50F increments adequate? Also is peak temperature indication important or is the only interest "Current" temperature?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  18. Fixed sensors for catch basin inspection?

    Would a miniature sensor mounted to catch basin grates and networked via cell and/or satellite be considered or is the solution required to use a vehicle mounted sensing system?

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  19. App requirements

    1. Is the app expected to be a mobile app, a web app, a voice assistant, or it is up to the proposer?
    2. Is there an expectation of the app working in offline mode?
    3. Should it include step-by-step navigation support?
    4. Can we assume that the users will have access to a smart phone? Should it work with non-smartphones and from web?
    5. Is there any requirements for multilingual support?
    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  20. Does FTA have research material about top issues users are facing in complete trips?

    Has FTA researched what the top challenges faced by users are for a complete trip? Are there a prioritized list that FTA wants to address for the maximum benefit of the users?

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea